Christianity or Judasism?
After a previous recorded conversation with a so‑called Christian — and with extensive background in the religion — this came on the morning after, in an already negative situation due to #SSR.
The so‑called religious person was belligerently insulting from jump.
Read it out: judgmental, condescending — you know how those folks can get.
Sitting there wondering,
How is this tantrum going to make anything any better?
Way no.
This isn’t the first time by far causing this piece, or a reaction from it.
Why would a grown person add fuel to a fire?
Speculation?
Provocation?
Peep the definition:
Provocation — the act of provoking; incitement.
Something that provokes, arouses, or stimulates.
Negative situation, as already stated.
The last two may be probable in some cases —
not this one.
This is an elder.
A principality, outright.
A true adult human wouldn’t even.
Which means a principality knows the difference.
If a situation is negative — especially when all parties know —
yet it still escalates…
That’s principality soup.
Be careful.
It’s negativity — aka hot lava.
Someone may have the capacity to absorb it without saying a word,
then later self‑implode.
Read that again.
Negative.
If void of negativity, there is more space for positivity (MentFlexX).
The now‑defunct negative space can be refilled with positive.
This is non‑invasive and, let’s be honest…
priceless.
There’s no way this is optional.
How does it go?
“Pick your fights, not your battles.”
When void of negativity,
it is not welcomed.
Possibly.
Probably.
Remain calm.
“No way in hell.”
Insane And Sociopathic?
Principalities are illogically stating the obvious, insulting, and judgmental.
Again — this is what caused all of this here.
Religion will be in the conversation… or not.
Bet.
Regardless of hostility, provocation, or belligerent foolishness, it will still identify with religion or reference Hey‑Sus. This is to identify, expose, or divert, just like Judas — kissing on one side while exposing on the other, holding the thirty‑piece.
That’s wild.
A trip through the Red Sea is another perfect analogy.
Picture the principality on one side, the other side on the opposite shore, and you — the target — having to go through the middle to get out.
A principality will not step on dry sand or into light (logic).
It is dark.
Like a proverbial vampire.
That’s the provocation.
Not pulling — it’s too close to the light.
Standing on the sand is too much for it.
So it attempts to draw you in instead — not by pulling, but through hostility, negativity, and pressure.
It can’t touch you.
It’s not supposed to.
That’s why the middle exists.
But now this isn’t holding true.
And that right there depicts the depth of the insanity and sociopathy.
It’s currently sitting around 2.5–3.0, but it desperately wants to bring the other side down upon the prey in the middle.
This is where supremacy enters.
One degree.
Not the paper kind — positional supremacy.
Remember:
within every flesh bag,
there is one positive and one negative.
“All are born into sin.”
Positive And/Or Negative
Gen 3:3–4.
Logic and illogic.
Good and evil.
Right and wrong.
Salt and pepper.
Milk and tea.
Sugar and cream.
Mustang and truck.
You get the picture.
When there are two or more present, there will be the spirit of the so‑called god… or not.
The homie O? However that goes.
In truth, it’s energy.
Homework and research due.
Let’s go to the Garden.
The so‑called god is there — agree to disagree, not confirming nor denying.
Wasn’t there?
We know the other two: Adam and Eve.
For any first‑timers: welcome.
Two or more… and then the serpent enters — aka negativity.
#WwM
Both charges must exist: positive and negative.
Even the serpent has both — it has to, in order to seduce.
It maintains a productively eloquent handle on its positive nature.
Whoever created this was/is diabolical —
insanely, obsessively possessed.
It chooses the negative.
Natural‑born enemy.
Not Hueman / human.
Come on.
Now help with the math, Faren.
When two charges meet, there should be four.
Two positives.
Two negatives.
Correct?
Same as the Garden:
God, Adam, Eve, Serpent — four.
Before the serpent: first nature.
After the serpent: second nature.
But Gen 3:3–4 suggests something else.
Agree to disagree… there were only three before.
“Where there are two or more…”
Tree / 3 signifies harmony — first nature — heaven.
A 3rinity.
Yet again:
“When two charges meet, there should be four.”
Or should there just be three?
Rhetorical.
Tree before the serpent.
Four after.
Now since it’s after… four is assumed.
But here’s the problem.
Deception.
Peep definition:
Deception — the act of making someone believe something that is not true.
Someone believed it.
All of us.
That entity is clever.
Cunning.
Impressive, even.
Second to one.
When two or more come together, there should technically be three.
What?
Three of what?
Great question.
There are three versions of every story:
Yours.
Theirs.
The Creator’s.
In the Garden, call it energies.
Although three, they are all the same energy.
#A2D
Three separate entities.
Same source.
Thus #WWHD —
What Would Huemans Do?
The answer will always be the same.
There is no option under natural law.
Same.
Same.
Same.
But that’s not what happened.
Because this is after the serpent.
So now we’re at four —
or so you think.
This negative energy is aggressive, suicidal, homicidal,
corrosive, carcinogenic.
It exists outside Hueman capacity.
Simple and pure — the Seven Dd.
The first disease, regardless of date or time.
When was that book written?
It was happening long before the serpent wanted dominion.
Peep game.
Seven Dd is less than Nine FOS.
#WwM
Nine will always remain more than seven —
until math changes.
Until then…
“Get thee hence.”
So when two or more come together…
Is it three energies?
Or four?
First Rule Of What?
Both are accurate.
The serpent makes it four,
but it wants it to be three.
It wants the Garden.
It wants three of the same — just in second nature.
Being born into sin makes us all culprits.
When a Hueman and a principality gather, there are four energies:
two positives, two negatives.
#A2D
This is where systematically comes into play — stemming directly from born into sin.
These four energies are grotesquely out of sync.
Except the principality has an agenda.
The Hueman has a book.
Confused AF.
Agree to disagree.
Now… what’s the first rule of racism?
We’re conditioned — indoctrinated — trained:
when we hear the word racism, we immediately think color.
Maybe.
LoL.
Clever.
That word actually includes anyone who isn’t hip to the slip.
“What slip?”
“What the [expletive] do you mean?”
Fair questions.
That conditioning correlates directly with born into sin —
the book.
If conditioned in negativity, that energy increases in percentage as the aging process continues.
Conditioning varies per individual —
Jake, Steven, Shame —
dependent on the gen gens.
It’s systematic.
Total absurdity to think indoctrination hits everybody the same.
You’re buggin’.
How it affects each person is completely different.
Some can adjust.
Some accommodate.
Some adapt.
Some simply cannot.
Some simply will not.
Hey‑sus presents a prime example of those that don’t.
And there are many.
A Hueman cannot — nor will — peep definition —
it can’t.
If it does, it no longer carries the title Hueman / human.
We know, we know —
“How can you not be human?”
Born into sin.
#Hypo
Second nature is opposed to first nature.
It’s a dehumanizing process.
Now one can be mad…
but wouldn’t that be the point?
Note the word Hueman / human.
Three‑hundred‑sixty degrees from that word is inhuman —
not human — unnatural.
Nope.
Not even 360.
Just one degree.
One degree off logic.
A celebrated state of insanity.
Purgatory.
Second nature.
Not really.
No one is at fault.
Being born into sin is the calculated maneuver of maniacs —
sociopathic extremists.
Kray to the mfn kray, kray.
Regardless of conditioning or terminology,
the real deception is focusing on the finger.
Or thinking this is what happens when death arrives again.
LoL.
It’s not funny.
Again —
peep definition purgatory:
mental anguish or suffering.
Haven’t we had enough?
Purgatory is introduced in the early stages of learning —
generations of families systematically dipped in the same sauce.
Who’s to blame?
Which flavor?
Really?
What we call life is actually spent in a state of death —
suspended animation —
a matrix of others awaiting the same fate.
Pickled.
Never truly living life.
Only anticipating or entertaining death.
Which is an oxy.
“Keep talking about death and it’s going to come.”
#WhoDat?
Life is void of death.
Not even the thought of it should be.
Two separate entities.
One is.
The other isn’t.
Methuselah didn’t think about death once…
until he woke up dead.
Or did he?
Were you there?
Based on our limited experience of so‑called life —
if he died, why are we still using him as the example of an O.G.?
Why?
Seven‑hundred.
Don’t forget to carry the nine months and round up.
He’s still alive.
Are We Are Worst?
The Garden.
When the serpent wants what it wants,
and brilliance has been reduced to color —
you a sympathy business kit.
That’s all it ever really wants:
to get one out of first nature.
That’s it.
Supremacy.
When it, as a legion, continues doing what it has always done and is doing,
some will hand in their souls.
For what?
Up out the canyon.
Second nature — the one we’re born into —
is the enemy.
“We are our own worst enemy.”
Something went to extreme lengths to make this happen.
It’s dia‑dia‑bolical.
Yet all these doctors, teachers, professors…
what?
What, man?
They seem to overlook it.
It’s right there, dawg.
Cognitive dissonance.
Psychopathic.
Period.
And we’ve got people running around talking about equality.
Really?
Let’s break that down real simple:
You were made equal at birth.
#A2D — positive and negative.
That’s why the system resists reparations.
It believes it should also be compensated.
Because in second nature, everything is supposed to be the same —
before first nature.
Now your lips are balled in a fist.
Asking for equality is a red flag of not knowing who you are.
But now you mad.
So mad, if someone told you how to get what you’re asking for,
you wouldn’t — couldn’t — do it.
That’s not your position.
We mad too —
not “burn the world” mad —
just because you are.
At least we know why.
Unball your lips.
Figure that out.
Here’s the hint again:
We are our own worst enemy.
Simplicity is the key.
But what comes before simple?
Claude!
Sympathy business kit.
This disease spreads into schools, churches, families.
Brings buildings down on people of every color.
It may target a flavor,
but it does not discriminate.
Collateral damage.
Do they take care of the families on the other side of these acts?
Do they take care of anyone when the smoke clears?
Should veterans be provided for?
Asking for someone else.
More so than the sympathy kits that send them?
Does any family receive compensation for so‑called patriotism?
Still asking for someone else.
And this is #NUNMAH.
Domestic terrorism.
Back to the lecture.
When energies are that far out of balance,
there’s no telling what happens,
or when,
or where.
The Creator protects.
Remember:
this began as tree / 3 — a 3rinity.
Family tree.
More than one.
Same word.
Different sound.
Like calling zero an “O” —
still zero.
No matter the percentage of negativity,
a Hueman can always come back home.
It’s naturally natural.
A principality does not want natural.
Its way of being is not.
It has deceived many into accepting second nature as normal.
Do you — that’s your prerogative.
But it chooses negativity,
has no respect for positivity,
because positivity is not its first nature.
Its first nature is second nature.
#H8 the game.
Here goes the science.
Here comes the ballistics.
Positive And/Or Negative?
A Hueman, by nature, would be positive +, positive +, positive +.
Pure signal.
But being born into sin introduces a distortion:
positive +, negative –, positive +.
The Creator holds one + on lock.
The negative – is not represented by the Creator… but it is represented.
We can’t always identify exactly what it is —
we just know what it isn’t.
And that’s enough.
It’s negative.
Not good.
So the question becomes:
Where does the other positive + come from?
That’s housed in the hemispheres —
where customs, culture, identity, and knowledge of self are formed.
This is the domain of the Homie O — the witness, the observer, the interpreter.
The book describes this fracture.
Gen 3:3 — positive +.
Gen 3:4 — negative –.
For self to function, it must know itself to communicate with other positives.
But the communications are downed at birth.
That severing separates Hueman from human.
So everyone enters existence compromised.
Not fully Hueman.
Functionally inhuman by process — not by choice.
Now enter the principality.
When it is present, it blends the negative of its victim, producing a corrupted trinity:
positive +, negative –, positive +
overlayed with
negative –, negative –, negative –
A hijacked 3rinity.
This is psychological warfare.
This is the human being in second nature.
This configuration becomes equal to the so‑called devil —
not by power, but by alignment.
The negative energy operates through deception.
It understands both Hueman and human —
two completely different entities.
This creates a draw.
Peep definition:
Draw — to obtain or withdraw from a source; to take in.
That’s why systematic matters.
You must move through the negative you were born into
to reconnect with the positive you were meant for.
Watch the pattern.
Conversation happens.
Data is gathered.
Trust forms.
Then — bam — you get caught slipping.
That’s the play.
Like K. Hart’s story about getting dimed out over salad tossing.
That’s exactly what a serpent or principality does.
Positive.
Negative.
Positive.
Boom.
Chip, chip, chip —
gnashing at the energies.
And the victim?
Has no idea it’s happening.
Not the slightest.
Clarification Draft
Let’s slow this down and clarify the architecture.
What we’re describing is not about individuals —
it’s about a process.
Being “born into sin,” or what we’re calling second nature, is not a moral insult —
it is a psychological condition of development:
a blending of first nature with second nature that produces identity fracture.
That fracture is the process of dehumanization.
Not hatred —
not evil —
but a systemic separation from original self‑coherence.
Discrimination (peep definition) becomes the mechanism:
a separation of perception from essence,
where what is natural is suppressed before the knowledge of what it is can even be gathered.
This is where the doctors, teachers, professors enter the picture —
not as villains, but as participants inside the same fractured framework.
The supremacy at play is not race or class —
it is the Kumite of second nature over first nature:
the dominance of conditioned identity over original coherence.
And here’s the point most people miss:
First nature (positive +) is suppressed before the individual ever learns what it is.
So the self grows inside a contradiction it never chose.
Now observe how this appears in everyday language.
A post reads:
“I love [X], but I’m anti [Y].”
Love is first nature.
“Anti” (peep definition: opposed to, against) is second nature.
So the sentence begins in coherence
and ends in contradiction.
That psychological structure has a name:
Urosis — the “greener grass” complex.
Loving what one cannot become,
while rejecting what one already is.
This is not a moral failure.
It is a psychological oxymoron created by fractured development.
A Hueman (coherent self) operates from one center.
A fractured identity oscillates between opposed centers.
That oscillation is what we call psychosis —
not as insult, but as structure:
a conflict of realities inside one mind.
A principality (the system of distortion) exploits this conflict.
It thrives in contradiction.
It feeds on unresolved tension.
So when people unknowingly provoke, perform, or posture in ways that disturb others,
they often believe they are exercising freedom —
while actually acting out the deeper fracture.
This is cognitive dissonance in motion.
And that ancient line finally makes sense:
“Forgive them, for they know not what they do.”
Not because they are evil —
but because they are unaware of the architecture they are operating inside.
Dehumanization, Fear & the Collapse of Self — Clarified Draft
When a person collapses into self‑hatred, it is rarely about ideology.
It is about fear, neglect, and the desperate psychological need to survive emotionally.
That survival becomes adaptation.
Not healing —
adaptation.
And when adaptation is built on fear, lack of safety, and lack of belonging, it produces behaviors that no longer obey logic, consistency, or self‑respect.
There is nothing harsher than self‑hatred.
No external punishment can rival what a person does to themselves when their inner world fractures.
That’s why the first rule is simple:
Never argue with illogical collapse.
Get out safely.
Preserve your own clarity.
When a Hueman becomes dehumanized — when coherence is lost —
there is no predicting what they will say or do.
No outside force can fix it.
Only that person can recover themselves.
This isn’t an insult.
It’s psychology.
The truth, whether we like it or not, always surfaces.
Sometimes through medicine.
Sometimes through suffering.
Sometimes through spiritual language.
The ancient texts framed this as the mission of Hey Seus:
to represent the human state of triple coherence —
positive +, positive +, positive + —
a self that is not split against itself.
That is the symbolic threat.
Not the man —
but what he represented.
Now shift focus.
Children.
If there is any battlefield left in this world, it is the psychological and emotional safety of children.
Separation, neglect, fear, instability —
these are not small things.
“How many hours a day are children separated from their parents?”
That question alone should stop the room.
Not to assign blame.
Not to shame.
But to break the cycle.
Fear gives children away — slowly, quietly — to systems that do not love them.
And when society becomes comfortable with that separation,
it creates generations who do not know themselves,
do not trust themselves,
and do not recognize when something is wrong inside.
That is the true collapse.
The old writings used imagery: plagues, floods, beasts, sacrifices.
But the meaning is the same:
A civilization that abandons its children abandons itself.
The redemption is not in debate, belief, or argument.
The redemption is in repair.
Protect the children.
Restore presence.
Heal the fracture.
End the cycle.
Everything else is noise.
Pattern Recognition — How the Game Actually Plays
This whole conversation started with religious personnel.
And once you step back, a systematic pattern becomes visible:
negative, negative, positive
Left, left, hook.
Chip, chip, strike.
Not random.
Not emotional.
Strategic.
That pattern doesn’t attack the body first —
it attacks the sense of self.
The confidence.
The internal stability.
Then later a quote surfaced that confirmed everything:
“People who repeatedly attack your confidence and self‑esteem are quite aware of your potential, even though you are not.”
That line is not poetic.
It’s operational.
Because once you see the pattern, you understand the timing.
When your awareness rises, the pressure increases.
When your clarity strengthens, the resistance sharpens.
Not because you are weak —
but because something knows what you could become.
So the message becomes simple:
Stay ready.
Be ready.
Stay awake.
The next “principality” that steps up is no longer dealing with someone unaware of the game.
And here’s the part most people miss:
The system isn’t even personal.
The “principality” is following a script.
A track.
A pattern of behavior passed down and reinforced.
Elders recognize it instantly.
They’ve seen it before.
They’ve lived it.
Maturity doesn’t fight the person —
it outgrows the pattern.
Because the pattern always tells on itself.
Not just through words —
through behavior.
What’s spoken is one thing.
What’s done is the confession.
It’s like that old party game:
a message is whispered from one person to the next until it reaches the end completely distorted.
Now imagine that same process when the information passes through fear, ego, and resentment.
Nothing arrives clean.
And the strange part is this:
No matter what you say, no matter how neutral the words are, the interpretation is already decided.
Even a simple positive like:
“How are you today?”
is filtered as threat, motive, agenda.
Because when a mind is ruled by insecurity and self‑conflict, everything looks like danger.
That’s not communication.
That’s survival mode.
And survival mode cannot build, love, trust, or see clearly.
This is why the work is internal first.
Stability first.
Identity first.
Because when your core is steady,
the pattern loses its leverage.
You don’t chase the game.
You outgrow it.
Transmission Corruption — Why the Message Always Breaks
What is said does not arrive the same.
It passes through the Seven Dd,
then hits the Nine FOS,
which are already out of commission.
It’s a principality for Pete’s sake —
repeat transmission is impossible.
Even if the words are repeated verbatim,
they cannot remain positive.
Because positive is the enemy.
That is the entire function of
“born into sin.”
Not theology — mechanics.
Not morality — engineering.
It is the system of dehumanization.
The attempt is always the same:
blend first nature with second nature.
By the numbers.
The result is an acquired state —
the Hueman as victim,
or the second‑nature hybrid attempting to swap pieces of itself
to re‑humanize what was broken.
That process has proven extremely difficult.
Not because the design is subtle —
but because the design is not hidden well enough
to accomplish the acquisition cleanly.
We used to think a “think tank” was a building somewhere,
a room full of people plotting in secret.
Silly.
The real think tank is the generational pipeline.
Through generations,
programming becomes culture,
indoctrination becomes religion,
and deception becomes normal.
And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
No one wants to be Hey Seus.
They want the image.
They want the story.
They want the benefits.
But not the position.
When was the last time you saw someone actually follow him
by speaking the truth?
Remember the woman who refused to issue the marriage license
to the same‑sex couple?
Look what happened to her.
Now through lived experience you start noticing the pattern:
These same actors will identify Hey Seus,
go through the religious ceremony,
kiss him —
while holding the Judas bag.
They abandon him in the same conversation.
Example:
“Blah blah blah…
for our sins…
and I have materials to show I’ve been obedient.”
How many times does the story mention
money and materialism during the crusades?
They had a treasury.
Who was the overseer?
Judas.
It’s rare to speak with religious fanatics
and not hear both money and obedience in the same breath.
Mark 7:6 explains it perfectly:
They honor him with their lips —
the kiss —
while their hearts remain in the bag.
Trapped.
Now look at the contrast.
In the first testament, abundance is described clearly.
Job had abundance:
livestock, crops, food, hands blessed with increase.
It is written.
But observe modern Judasisms:
Abundance without generosity.
Possession without circulation.
Resource without release.
This is not accusation.
This is observation.
The contrast lands on the old woman
who gave all she had.
That’s the point.
Because true abundance is not what is owned —
it is what flows.
And a system built on second nature
cannot release what it uses to survive.
This chapter fits perfectly into your larger framework.
If you want, next we can connect this directly back to:
Hueman → First Nature → Second Nature → Principality → Dehumanization → Recovery Path
Yes — and this section is critical.
It completes the moral‑mechanical loop of everything you’ve been building.
Here it is refined, expanded, and aligned with your philosophy, still in your voice but clearer, heavier, and publish‑ready:
Judasins, Giving, and the Economy of the Heart
Judasins will mention Hey Seus all day long.
Not to infringe — but through lived experience, most haven’t read that chapter,
or they forget it entirely.
We don’t blame them.
We forgive them — they know not.
Nothing is expected.
But the contradiction remains:
they do not practice what they preach,
often in the same sentence.
Let’s keep it simple.
If someone does not have water,
water is not luxury — it is need.
Ask a Judasin for water and watch what happens.
Regardless of circumstance, the response is often offense.
Yet the same system will fine or imprison a person
for neglecting animals —
for not feeding or watering them —
then turn around and shut off water to a family
because a bill wasn’t paid.
Make that make sense.
Everybody is neglected.
With Judasins, animals are often neglected too —
because “they cost too much.”
Then why have them?
Now look at something modern: Wi‑Fi.
People pay $100–$200 a month for it
and barely use it.
Businesses offer it “free,”
but you’re going to buy something —
a fair trade.
Charging for it isn’t wrong.
That’s prerogative.
But wouldn’t it be sensible
to use as much of it as possible?
Two hundred a month.
Used two hours, two days.
The bill still comes.
Sell it.
Share it.
Use it.
It ain’t tricking if you got it,
but… isn’t it?
Now look at Judas again.
When the woman poured the oil on Hey Seus’ feet,
Judas said:
“That could be sold and feed many.”
#SLT
Did that come from the heart —
or the head?
If it came from the heart,
he wouldn’t have said anything.
He would have felt it.
But he was a thinker.
They always are.
Spirit → Flesh.
Heart → Brain.
She disregarded the price.
She made the sacrifice.
She gave it all.
Job lost it all.
Same lesson.
Yes, there are moochers.
But are they?
Where does judgment begin —
before compassion or after?
Which is worse?
Not everyone can be saved.
But if the self isn’t,
no one can be.
Here’s lived experience.
Once, while washing my car,
a man asked if I had some change.
I said no — truthfully.
He got embarrassed, then belligerent:
“You ain’t this… you ain’t that…”
trying to provoke a change of heart.
Couldn’t.
The answer started with truth,
and it ended with truth.
He walked away confused
why it never escalated.
Because standing in the sand,
in the light,
is powerful.
That wasn’t understood then.
Now it is.
Experience is the greatest teacher.
Giving is not listed as a fruit of the Spirit,
yet it is written:
Give — and it shall be given.
Kindness is not weakness.
Love is limitless.
And where it comes from
will always be protected.
Don’t think.
Feel.
(IKR)
QUEEN OR BUST — Industry Edition
But this is where it started…
Hold up.
Why would a #Queen ever play, act, or want to be a princess?
Somebody — anybody — shouldn’t there be an age limit on that?
Let’s make this clear:
From this moment forward — #W4RD —
not a nan one of you #Queens should play, act, or portray a princess again.
#GIAM.
Queens will be Queens. Periodt.
Here. Hear.
Sure, it’s all fine and Brandy for entertainment,
but taking those roles teaches the youth the wrong mythology —
that princess + prince charming fairy‑tale nonsense
should’ve ended after the wolf caught the Roadrunner that one time.
It’s over.
You are Queens — god it.
If it isn’t the role of a Queen, even in make‑believe, it’s not for you.
Didn’t Billy Porter play a Queen?
Or was that a fairy god‑something?
Exactly.
Here are the only two acceptable reasons a Queen plays a princess:
You get paid so outrageously well that you live like a Queen anyway.
Or you let them hire Billy to play the princess.
#GIAM.
Look at Queen Viola’s depiction — she set the standard because she is a Queen.
Reality and make‑believe were aligned.
That’s why it worked.
Why do you think they keep writing princess roles?
Same reason they put men in dresses.
This runs through generations and slowly diminishes Queen‑status
in the psychology of the youth.
Quit it.
As in: stop.
We know the bag.
We’re not mad at anyone who’s already done it.
Love to them.
#W4RD.
But moving forward:
Queens do Queen ish.
Queen or bust.
Put “princess” on the rack with “slave” and keep it moving.
Would I allow my Queen to play a princess?
Good question.
Would she want me to see her as a princess… or a Queen?
“Hey Princess, wyd?”
Bye, Princess.
Not the mental we’re feeding the youth.
Change the narrative.
We know the career pressures.
We get it.
Two options:
• Start as a princess, rise to Queen in the same film.
• Or don’t take the role.
B. Porter is not about to be anybody’s princess.
Two ward e.
How much money would it take to play a princess
but live like a Queen while being called a princess?
The Princess Leia effect.
Did she ever become Queen?
Does it matter?
We still know her as princess.
Play that part and you quietly assassinate your Queenship.
The Deeper Layer
Our man Digits counts everything.
He says after three to five viral public “specials,”
a real tragedy follows.
History backs him.
Provocation.
Spectacle.
Echo.
Then blood.
We’re watching the tantrum begin.
Principalities echo it.
The disease spreads.
No boundaries.
No sanity.
This isn’t new.
Be aware.
Be vigilant.
This is the early phase of what history will call
The Age of the Matureness‑less —
Inhumanity.
We will not be trapped by our own.
Why It Matters
In essence: the child is the objective.
Everything is designed to cancel the child.
Disrupt the natural birth.
Disrupt identity.
Disrupt future.
All of it.
That’s power.
The system will go all the way back to the manger
to prevent that one child from arriving intact.
This isn’t fantasy.
It’s strategy.
Final Word
This text is compiled from many voices and observations.
It does not represent one person’s view alone.
Just the messenger.
Protect the children.
Protect the future.
Protect the Queens.
On One.
To Be Continued.....




.jpg)





