Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Cheap Reaction (Industry Cut)

The Economy of Belief 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Why Reaction Is Cheap and Thinking Is Expensive

There is an invisible economy operating inside the human mind.

It does not trade money.
It trades beliefs, assumptions, reactions, and attention.

Every conversation is a market.
Every argument is a transaction.
Every reaction costs something.

The surprising part is that most people are spending their mental currency without even realizing it.

They react quickly.
They defend positions instantly.
They argue passionately.

Yet very few stop to ask a simple question:

What is the cost of being wrong?

Not socially.
Not emotionally.

Mentally.

Because when a person defends something that is not actually true, they invest energy in maintaining an illusion.

And maintaining illusions is expensive.

Thinking, on the other hand, requires effort.
Reflection requires patience.
Investigation requires humility.

That is why quick reactions dominate most conversations.

Reaction is cheap.

Thinking is expensive.


The Fast Lane of Certainty  

___________________________________________________________________________________

Human beings naturally prefer certainty.

Certainty feels stable.

It removes the discomfort of doubt.

If someone believes something strongly enough, their mind no longer has to wrestle with questions.

The problem is that certainty is often built on foundations that were never tested.

Someone hears something once.

Someone reads a sentence online.

Someone repeats a statement they heard from a friend.

Soon the idea becomes solid in their mind.

Not because it has been proven.

But because it has been repeated.

Repetition has a strange psychological effect.

The more often a statement appears, the more familiar it becomes.

And familiarity can easily disguise itself as truth.


The Authority Shortcut

___________________________________________________________________________________

Another reason beliefs become strong so quickly is authority.

When information comes from someone perceived as knowledgeable, people often accept it without further examination.

A teacher says it.

A preacher says it.

A celebrity says it.

A politician says it.

And suddenly the idea travels through society like a sealed package that no one opens.

Authority is not always wrong.

But authority is not always right either.

When authority replaces inquiry, thinking becomes optional.

And when thinking becomes optional, misunderstanding becomes inevitable.


The Attention Marketplace

___________________________________________________________________________________

Modern society runs on a powerful resource: attention.

Every platform competes for it.

News cycles compete for it.

Social media feeds compete for it.

Entire industries profit from capturing and directing human focus.

The faster people react, the more attention they generate.

And the more attention they generate, the more profitable the system becomes.

Quick reactions are rewarded.

Nuanced thinking is often ignored.

In that environment, the speed of reaction becomes more valuable than the accuracy of understanding.

But accuracy is the foundation of wisdom.

Without accuracy, a society begins operating on assumptions.


The Emotional Amplifier

___________________________________________________________________________________

Emotion accelerates belief.

Anger spreads faster than curiosity.

Fear spreads faster than analysis.

Outrage spreads faster than investigation.

Emotion amplifies messages and pushes them through social networks like electrical currents through wires.

When an idea carries emotional energy, people feel compelled to respond immediately.

They repost it.

They argue about it.

They defend it.

But emotional intensity does not guarantee factual accuracy.

In fact, strong emotion sometimes signals that the mind has stopped analyzing and started reacting.


The Birth of the Instant Opinion

___________________________________________________________________________________

Opinions used to develop slowly.

People gathered information over time.

They listened to multiple perspectives.

They reflected before speaking.

Today, the environment encourages instant opinions.

Information arrives continuously.

People scroll, skim, and react within seconds.

Instead of examining ideas, many people choose sides immediately.

Once a side is chosen, confirmation bias begins its work.

The mind searches for evidence supporting the chosen position while ignoring contradictory information.

The opinion becomes reinforced.

Not because it is correct.

But because the mind has built a protective wall around it.


The Psychological Investment 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Once someone has publicly expressed a belief, changing that belief becomes difficult.

The belief is no longer just an idea.

It becomes part of the person's identity.

Admitting uncertainty can feel like admitting weakness.

So instead of adjusting their position, people double down.

They defend their belief more aggressively.

They argue more forcefully.

They gather selective evidence.

And the cycle continues.

What started as a simple assumption evolves into a deeply defended conviction.


When Assumptions Become Conflicts

___________________________________________________________________________________

Many conflicts begin not with facts, but with interpretations.

A person sees something.

Their mind assigns meaning to it.

Another person sees the same event and assigns a different meaning.

Now there are two stories competing for dominance.

Each person believes their interpretation is correct.

But interpretations are not the same as reality.

They are mental constructions.

Yet when interpretations harden into beliefs, disagreement becomes confrontation.


The Cost of Mental Rigidity


___________________________________________________________________________________

Mental rigidity carries hidden costs.

It limits learning.

It blocks new perspectives.

It transforms conversations into battles instead of explorations.

A rigid mind prioritizes being right.

A flexible mind prioritizes discovering what is true.

The difference between those two goals determines the quality of thought.

One seeks validation.

The other seeks understanding.


The MentFlexX Perspective

___________________________________________________________________________________

Within the MentFlexX philosophy, mental flexibility becomes a form of discipline.

The mind is trained to observe itself.

Instead of automatically accepting every thought, the individual learns to examine them.

Questions become tools.

Reflection becomes practice.

Assumptions become opportunities for investigation.

This does not mean abandoning belief.

It means strengthening belief through examination rather than protecting it through defensiveness.

A belief that survives examination becomes stronger.

A belief that cannot survive examination deserves reconsideration.


The Pause That Changes Everything

___________________________________________________________________________________

There is a powerful moment that exists between stimulus and response.

Psychologists often refer to it as the pause.

It is the brief space where awareness can intervene before reaction occurs.

Most people move through this moment too quickly to notice it.

But those who train their awareness begin to recognize it.

Inside that pause lies freedom.

Freedom to think.

Freedom to question.

Freedom to choose a response instead of surrendering to impulse.


The Discipline of Deliberate Thinking

___________________________________________________________________________________

Deliberate thinking requires slowing the mind down.

Instead of reacting immediately, the thinker evaluates the situation.

They ask:

What do I actually know?

What assumptions am I making?

What evidence exists?

Could there be another explanation?

These questions transform the mind from a reaction machine into an investigation tool.


The Social Pressure of Agreement

___________________________________________________________________________________

Another force influencing belief is the pressure to conform.

Humans are social creatures.

Belonging to a group provides safety and identity.

When a group shares a common belief, questioning that belief can feel risky.

People may fear rejection, criticism, or exclusion.

So instead of challenging the idea, they adopt it.

Agreement becomes a social survival strategy.

But widespread agreement does not guarantee accuracy.

History provides countless examples of widely accepted beliefs that later proved incorrect.


The Courage to Question

___________________________________________________________________________________

Questioning beliefs requires courage.

Not aggression.

Not arrogance.

Courage.

Because questioning means stepping into uncertainty.

It means admitting that something might not be as clear as it appears.

Yet that uncertainty is where growth begins.

A person who never questions their beliefs remains limited by them.

A person who questions thoughtfully expands their understanding.


The Evolution of Understanding

___________________________________________________________________________________

Knowledge evolves.

Scientific theories evolve.

Cultural perspectives evolve.

Even personal beliefs evolve over time.

What someone believed at twenty may look very different at forty.

Growth often requires updating mental models.

But updating those models requires recognizing when they are outdated.

Without reflection, outdated beliefs remain frozen in place.


The Balance Between Faith and Inquiry

___________________________________________________________________________________

Faith and inquiry do not have to be enemies.

Faith can provide meaning, direction, and purpose.

Inquiry ensures that belief remains connected to reality.

When faith refuses examination, it becomes fragile.

When inquiry refuses humility, it becomes arrogant.

But when faith and inquiry work together, understanding deepens.


The Quiet Power of Intellectual Humility

___________________________________________________________________________________

One of the most underrated intellectual traits is humility.

Not the kind that diminishes confidence.

The kind that recognizes the limits of knowledge.

Intellectual humility allows someone to say:

“I may not have the full picture.”

That statement opens the door to learning.

Without it, the door remains closed.


The Role of Curiosity

___________________________________________________________________________________

Curiosity transforms conflict into conversation.

Instead of asking, “How can I prove I am right?”

Curiosity asks, “What might I be missing?”

This shift changes the entire dynamic of discussion.

Arguments become explorations.

Disagreements become opportunities to refine understanding.


Reclaiming the Value of Thought

___________________________________________________________________________________

In a culture that rewards speed, reclaiming thoughtful reflection becomes a quiet act of resistance.

It means refusing to participate in reaction cycles.

It means examining information carefully.

It means valuing truth more than validation.

Thoughtful thinking may not generate the loudest responses.

But it produces the most reliable conclusions.


The Long Game of Understanding

___________________________________________________________________________________

Quick reactions provide immediate emotional satisfaction.

But they rarely produce lasting wisdom.

Understanding develops slowly.

It requires patience.

It requires curiosity.

It requires the willingness to revisit assumptions repeatedly.

Those who engage in this process develop mental resilience.

They become less vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation.


A Simple Practice 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Anyone can begin strengthening their thinking process with a simple habit.

Before reacting to new information, ask three questions:

  1. What evidence supports this claim?

  2. What alternative explanations exist?

  3. What information might still be missing?

These questions slow down the rush toward certainty.

And in that slower pace, clarity begins to emerge.


The Real Advantage

___________________________________________________________________________________

In a world dominated by instant reactions, the ability to think carefully becomes a rare advantage.

Those who cultivate thoughtful awareness gain something valuable.

They become less reactive.

Less easily manipulated.

More capable of seeing complexity.

More capable of navigating disagreement without hostility.

That advantage does not appear overnight.

It develops through practice.

Through reflection.

Through the willingness to think one more time before reacting.


The MentFlexX Principle

___________________________________________________________________________________

Within the MentFlexX philosophy, mental flexibility becomes a guiding principle.

Instead of clinging rigidly to ideas, the thinker remains adaptable.

They test their assumptions.

They refine their beliefs.

They stay open to new information.

This flexibility is not weakness.

It is strength.

Because a flexible mind can adjust when reality demands it.

A rigid mind often breaks under pressure.


The Future of Thought

___________________________________________________________________________________

The modern world will continue accelerating.

Information will continue multiplying.

Opinions will continue forming faster than understanding.

In that environment, the most valuable skill may not be intelligence alone.

It may be disciplined thinking.

The ability to pause.

To examine.

To question.

To learn.

And to update beliefs when evidence requires it.


Final Reflection

___________________________________________________________________________________

Every belief carries weight.

Every assumption carries risk.

Every reaction carries consequence.

The mind can choose the fast lane of certainty.

Or it can choose the slower path of investigation.

One path produces noise.

The other produces clarity.

And clarity, once developed, becomes one of the most powerful tools a person can possess.




 ðŸ‘Š

Hope and Faith (Mainstream Mix)




The Fight That Never Happened

___________________________________________________________________________________

Thinking Ten Times in a World That Reacts Once


Some people are quick to ball their faces into a fist when someone else does not share the same idea about how something is.

Sometimes it is because the other person disagrees.

Sometimes it is because the other person agrees—but not in the same way.

Either way, tension builds.

The interesting part is that many of these confrontations do not begin with truth.

They begin with belief.

Someone believes something.

Someone heard something.

Someone assumes something.

And before long, people are ready to defend something that may not even be correct.

In fact, the belief being defended might have a 100 percent chance of being wrong.

Yet the certainty behind it can still be absolute.

This is where two words often enter the conversation:

Hope and faith.


Understanding Hope

___________________________________________________________________________________

The word hope carries meanings that many people rarely think about.

Hope can describe:

• A sloping plain between mountain ridges
• A small bay or inlet
• A haven or safe place

But hope also describes a mental state.

Hope is a desire for something good, combined with the expectation that it might happen.

That last part matters.

Hope is not proof.

Hope is possibility.

Hope says:

"I want this to happen, and I believe it could."

But hope does not say:

"I know this will happen."

There is uncertainty built into hope.

And uncertainty is important, because it reminds us that our expectations are not always reality.


                       Understanding Faith

___________________________________________________________________________________

Faith moves a step further.

Faith is defined as belief based on trust.

Often it is belief based on the authority or testimony of someone else.

Faith can also mean loyalty, fidelity, or trust in something unseen.

Faith has inspired civilizations, movements, communities, and personal transformation.

But faith still exists in a space where certainty is not always visible.

Faith says:

"I trust this to be true."

But it does not necessarily say:

"I can prove this beyond question."


The Gap Between Belief and Knowledge

___________________________________________________________________________________

Here is where problems begin.

People often confuse belief with knowledge.

There are actually different levels of certainty.

For example:

• I heard it.
• I think it is true.
• I believe it.
• I am pretty sure.
• I know it.

Those statements are not equal.

Yet in everyday life, people treat them like they are the same thing.

Someone hears something once and suddenly it becomes fact.

Someone assumes something and defends it as truth.

Someone believes something strongly enough that disagreement feels like an attack.

At that point, discussion becomes conflict.


The Ego Problem

___________________________________________________________________________________

When beliefs attach themselves to ego, questioning the idea feels like questioning the person.

Instead of curiosity, the conversation becomes defensive.

Instead of listening, people prepare their response.

Instead of understanding, they prepare for battle.

And sometimes that battle becomes literal.

Arguments escalate.

Voices rise.

Postures change.

Faces tighten.

All over something that might not even be correct.


Think Ten Times 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some people were raised with a simple rule.

Think ten times.

Not once.

Not twice.

Ten times.

That rule sounds simple, but it carries powerful discipline.

Thinking ten times means pausing before reacting.

It means asking questions before assuming answers.

It means allowing the mind to examine something instead of immediately defending it.

Most arguments in the world happen because someone reacted after thinking once.

Very few arguments happen after someone has thought ten times.


The Society of Quick Reactions    

                   


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modern society moves fast.

Opinions form quickly.

Information spreads instantly.

Reactions happen in seconds.

But truth rarely moves that quickly.

Truth requires investigation.

Truth requires patience.

Truth requires the willingness to admit when something is uncertain.

Without those things, people begin living inside mental shortcuts.

Those shortcuts often lead to misunderstandings.

And misunderstandings often lead to conflict.


The “What-If Fight”

One of the strangest types of conflict is something that can be called the What-If Fight.

A What-If Fight happens when people argue about something that could have happened but never actually did.

For example:

Someone might say:

"That could have tipped over."

That may be true.

Maybe it could have.

But it did not.

Yet the conversation now shifts into an imaginary timeline where the event actually occurred.

Suddenly emotions rise.

Defensiveness appears.

And the argument begins.

But the argument is not about reality.

It is about imagination.

Two people are fighting over something that never happened.


The Language of Speculation 


___________________________________________________________________________________

Once a conversation enters that territory, certain words appear.

They are familiar words.

Could have.

Should have.

Would have.

Those words describe possibilities, not facts.

They live inside imagined scenarios.

Yet people often treat those scenarios like they are real events.

That is how arguments grow larger than the situations that created them.


When Imagination Becomes Conflict

___________________________________________________________________________________

Imagine two people standing in a room.

Nothing has happened.

Everything is calm.

Then someone says:

"That could have gone wrong."

Now the mind begins constructing a story.

"What if it had gone wrong?"

"What if someone got hurt?"

"What if someone caused the problem?"

Suddenly tension appears.

But the tension is based on a story, not an event.

That is the power of the human mind.

It can create emotional reactions to things that never occurred.


The Internal Red Light 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Most people have experienced a moment when something inside them signals caution.

It feels like a mental red light.

A pause.

A small voice that says:

"Wait a second."

"This argument may not make sense."

That moment is important.

It is the opportunity to step outside the reaction.

To observe the situation instead of being controlled by it.

But many people ignore that signal.

They push through the red light.

And the argument continues.


The Heart of the Matter

___________________________________________________________________________________

There is an old teaching that says:

"Out of the heart come the issues of life."

In other words, what people say and do often reveals what is happening internally.

When someone speaks from the heart, their words usually deal with reality.

But when someone speaks from speculation, their words often revolve around imagined outcomes.

That is where the cycle of could have, should have, would have begins.


MentFlexX and the Discipline of Awareness

___________________________________________________________________________________

Within the MentFlexX framework, awareness becomes a discipline.

Instead of reacting instantly, the individual trains themselves to observe their thoughts.

That observation creates space.

Inside that space lies choice.

When a person becomes aware of their own assumptions, they gain the ability to question them.

They can ask:

Is this actually happening?

Or am I reacting to something I imagined?

That question alone can prevent many unnecessary conflicts.


The Mind as a Story Builder

___________________________________________________________________________________

The human brain is designed to interpret incomplete information.

If something is unclear, the mind attempts to fill in the gaps.

Sometimes those interpretations are correct.

Other times they are not.

But once the mind creates a story, it often becomes attached to it.

That attachment can make the story feel like truth.

Even when it is not.


The Discipline of Thinking Ten Times

___________________________________________________________________________________

The MentFlexX approach introduces a simple but powerful practice.

Before reacting, ask yourself three questions:

1. Do I actually know this is true?

2. Could I be misunderstanding the situation?

3. What evidence supports my reaction?

Those questions slow the mind down.

And when the mind slows down, clarity increases.


The Strength of Saying “I Might Be Wrong”

___________________________________________________________________________________

One of the most powerful statements a person can make is simple.

"I might be wrong."

That statement does not weaken a person.

It strengthens them.

Because it shows that their identity is not tied to being correct.

It shows that they value truth more than ego.

And truth is easier to find when ego steps aside.


Breaking the Cycle 

_________________________________________


Many conflicts disappear when people return to one basic question:

What actually happened?

Not what could have happened.

Not what might have happened.

Not what someone imagined could have happened.

Just the reality of the moment.

When the conversation returns to reality, many arguments dissolve.


A Practice for Daily Life
_________________________________________

Here is a simple exercise.

The next time a disagreement begins to form, pause and ask:

What part of this situation is fact?

What part is assumption?

What part is imagination?

That pause alone can change the direction of the conversation.

Sometimes it even reveals that the argument never needed to happen at all.


The Lesson 

___________________________________________________________________________________

The world is full of strong opinions.

But strong opinions are not always strong truths.

Hope and faith both have value.

They guide people through uncertainty.

But when belief turns into automatic reaction, conflict becomes easy.

Thinking ten times changes that.

It introduces reflection.

It introduces awareness.

It introduces discipline.

And sometimes it reveals something surprising.

The fight that almost happened…

never needed to exist at all.



What-If Fight (Hip Hop Edited Cut)

 

Hope, Faith, and the Difference.

_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

A reflection on belief, uncertainty, and the arguments we create

Some people are quick to ball their faces into a fist when someone else doesn’t share the same idea about how something is—or maybe even because they do. The conflict isn’t always about truth. Sometimes it’s simply because the other person isn’t running with what they were told, or even with what they themselves believe.

Instead of examining what has actually been found out or researched, the reaction becomes emotional. The argument begins not over facts, but over belief.

And here’s the catch:

A belief can carry a 100% chance of being wrong and still be defended with absolute certainty.

That’s where two words enter the conversation: hope and faith.


_______________________________________________________

What Is Hope?

The word hope has deeper meanings than we usually consider.

Hope can mean:

  • A sloping plain between mountain ridges

  • A small bay or haven

  • A desire for good, paired with the expectation that it can be obtained

  • Something or someone that gives reason to expect good things

The interesting part is that hope always contains uncertainty.

Hope says:
“I want this to happen, and I believe it might.”

But hope is not proof.
It is anticipation, not verification.


What Is Faith?   

_______________________________________________________

Faith takes things even further.

Faith is defined as:

  • Belief based on the authority of another

  • Acceptance of something as true without direct evidence

  • Confidence or trust placed in testimony

  • Loyalty or fidelity to a promise, belief, or system

Faith can be powerful. It can move people to action, build communities, and sustain people through hardship.

But it still operates in a space where certainty isn’t always present.

Faith says:
“I believe this is true, even if I cannot fully prove it.”


The Problem With Belief Without Reflection  

_______________________________________________________

When people operate only on belief—without examination—they sometimes become defensive.

Arguments erupt.

Tempers rise.

People become ready to fight over ideas that haven’t been fully explored.

Not because they know something.

But because they think they know something.

That raises an important question:

What are the levels of knowing?

For example:

  • I heard it.

  • I think it’s true.

  • I’m pretty sure.

  • I believe it.

  • I know it.

Those are not the same thing.

Yet in everyday life, people often treat them as if they are.


Think Ten Times  
_______________________________________________________

Some people were taught a simple rule:

“Think ten times.”

That advice carries wisdom.

Before reacting…

Before arguing…

Before turning words into fists…

Think again.

Seek another opinion.

Look deeper.

A second or third perspective is rarely a bad idea. Not because you must change your mind—but because understanding grows when ideas are tested.


The Society of Whims

_______________________________________________________
Much of modern society runs on whims rather than truths.

People follow trends.

They repeat things they heard.

They defend positions they haven’t investigated.

For the followers, the warning has always existed:

“Be not deceived.”

If you are unsure about something, there is a strong possibility that you do not yet have the full picture.


The “What-If Fight”

_______________________________________________________

Here’s an example of how quickly things can spiral.

Have you ever been in an argument—or almost in a fight—with someone because of something that might have happened?

Not something that actually happened.

Something that could have happened.

Imagine two people nearly coming to blows over a situation that never occurred.

That kind of conflict deserves a name:

The “What-If Fight.”

A fight over imagination.

A feud born from possibility rather than reality.


Could’ve, Should’ve, Would’ve


_______________________________________________________

Arguments often drift into a familiar territory:

  • Could’ve

  • Should’ve

  • Would’ve

Someone says something like:

“That could’ve tipped over.”

Yes—maybe it could have.

But it didn’t.

So why is the conversation happening in a space built entirely on speculation?

Instead of discussing what actually occurred, the conversation moves into an imaginary timeline.

And from there, emotions begin to escalate.


The Principle Behind It

_______________________________________________________

This type of conflict often revolves around principle rather than fact.

A person believes they are defending what might have been wrong.

But they are reacting to a scenario that never existed.

That creates a fabricated argument.

A conflict born from assumptions.


The Heart of the Matter

_______________________________________________________

There is an old saying:

“From out of the heart…”

Meaning that what comes from a person’s heart reveals their true nature.

If someone were truly speaking from the heart, would their words be filled with:

  • could’ve

  • should’ve

  • would’ve

Or would they focus on what actually is?

The heart tends to deal with truth.

Speculation tends to deal with fear.


Recognizing the Moment

_______________________________________________________

Sometimes there is a moment—a signal.

A kind of internal red light.

A quiet voice that says:

“This argument is about to become something unnecessary.”

That moment is the opening.

The chance to pause.

The chance to realize:

“This might be a stupid argument.”

Not because anyone is stupid.

But because the foundation of the argument isn’t real.


Choosing Clarity Over Conflict

_______________________________________________________

When people slow down and examine their assumptions, something powerful happens.

Arguments shrink.

Understanding grows.

And sometimes the realization appears:

“If I had looked at it that way before, I might not be where I am now.”

That moment is not defeat.

It’s growth.



  1. Apologies that the Hip Hop grammar has been modified. This is A. i. issued. Stay tuned we're in works to bring back the original Hip Hop. This is souly an individual effort. The artist loves to express.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

QUEEN OR BUST (Who You With-Industry Cut)


Christianity or Judasism?

After a previous recorded conversation with a so‑called Christian — and with extensive background in the religion — this came on the morning after, in an already negative situation due to #SSR.

The so‑called religious person was belligerently insulting from jump.
Read it out: judgmental, condescending — you know how those folks can get.

Sitting there wondering,
How is this tantrum going to make anything any better?
Way no.

This isn’t the first time by far causing this piece, or a reaction from it.
Why would a grown person add fuel to a fire?

Speculation?
Provocation?

Peep the definition:

Provocation — the act of provoking; incitement.
Something that provokes, arouses, or stimulates.

Negative situation, as already stated.
The last two may be probable in some cases —
not this one.

This is an elder.
A principality, outright.

A true adult human wouldn’t even.
Which means a principality knows the difference.

If a situation is negative — especially when all parties know
yet it still escalates…

That’s principality soup.

Be careful.
It’s negativity — aka hot lava.

Someone may have the capacity to absorb it without saying a word,
then later self‑implode.

Read that again.

Negative.
If void of negativity, there is more space for positivity (MentFlexX).
The now‑defunct negative space can be refilled with positive.

This is non‑invasive and, let’s be honest…
priceless.

There’s no way this is optional.

How does it go?

“Pick your fights, not your battles.”

When void of negativity,
it is not welcomed.

Possibly.
Probably.

Remain calm.

“No way in hell.”




Insane And Sociopathic? 

Principalities are illogically stating the obvious, insulting, and judgmental.
Again — this is what caused all of this here.

Religion will be in the conversation… or not.
Bet.

Regardless of hostility, provocation, or belligerent foolishness, it will still identify with religion or reference Hey‑Sus. This is to identify, expose, or divert, just like Judas — kissing on one side while exposing on the other, holding the thirty‑piece.
That’s wild.

A trip through the Red Sea is another perfect analogy.
Picture the principality on one side, the other side on the opposite shore, and you — the target — having to go through the middle to get out.

A principality will not step on dry sand or into light (logic).
It is dark.
Like a proverbial vampire.
That’s the provocation.

Not pulling — it’s too close to the light.
Standing on the sand is too much for it.

So it attempts to draw you in instead — not by pulling, but through hostility, negativity, and pressure.
It can’t touch you.
It’s not supposed to.

That’s why the middle exists.

But now this isn’t holding true.

And that right there depicts the depth of the insanity and sociopathy.
It’s currently sitting around 2.5–3.0, but it desperately wants to bring the other side down upon the prey in the middle.

This is where supremacy enters.
One degree.
Not the paper kind — positional supremacy.

Remember:
within every flesh bag,
there is one positive and one negative.

“All are born into sin.”


 


Positive And/Or Negative

Gen 3:3–4.
Logic and illogic.
Good and evil.
Right and wrong.
Salt and pepper.
Milk and tea.
Sugar and cream.
Mustang and truck.

You get the picture.

When there are two or more present, there will be the spirit of the so‑called god… or not.
The homie O? However that goes.

In truth, it’s energy.
Homework and research due.

Let’s go to the Garden.

The so‑called god is there — agree to disagree, not confirming nor denying.
Wasn’t there?
We know the other two: Adam and Eve.
For any first‑timers: welcome.

Two or more… and then the serpent enters — aka negativity.
#WwM

Both charges must exist: positive and negative.
Even the serpent has both — it has to, in order to seduce.
It maintains a productively eloquent handle on its positive nature.

Whoever created this was/is diabolical —
insanely, obsessively possessed.

It chooses the negative.
Natural‑born enemy.
Not Hueman / human.
Come on.

Now help with the math, Faren.

When two charges meet, there should be four.
Two positives.
Two negatives.
Correct?

Same as the Garden:
God, Adam, Eve, Serpent — four.

Before the serpent: first nature.
After the serpent: second nature.

But Gen 3:3–4 suggests something else.

Agree to disagree… there were only three before.
“Where there are two or more…”
Tree / 3 signifies harmony — first nature — heaven.
A 3rinity.

Yet again:
“When two charges meet, there should be four.”
Or should there just be three?

Rhetorical.

Tree before the serpent.
Four after.

Now since it’s after… four is assumed.

But here’s the problem.

Deception.
Peep definition:
Deception — the act of making someone believe something that is not true.

Someone believed it.
All of us.

That entity is clever.
Cunning.
Impressive, even.
Second to one.

When two or more come together, there should technically be three.

What?
Three of what?

Great question.

There are three versions of every story:
Yours.
Theirs.
The Creator’s.

In the Garden, call it energies.
Although three, they are all the same energy.
#A2D

Three separate entities.
Same source.

Thus #WWHD —
What Would Huemans Do?

The answer will always be the same.
There is no option under natural law.

Same.
Same.
Same.

But that’s not what happened.

Because this is after the serpent.

So now we’re at four
or so you think.

This negative energy is aggressive, suicidal, homicidal,
corrosive, carcinogenic.

It exists outside Hueman capacity.

Simple and pure — the Seven Dd.
The first disease, regardless of date or time.

When was that book written?
It was happening long before the serpent wanted dominion.

Peep game.

Seven Dd is less than Nine FOS.
#WwM

Nine will always remain more than seven —
until math changes.

Until then…

“Get thee hence.”

So when two or more come together…

Is it three energies?
Or four?


                              

First Rule Of What?

Both are accurate.

The serpent makes it four,
but it wants it to be three.

It wants the Garden.
It wants three of the same — just in second nature.

Being born into sin makes us all culprits.

When a Hueman and a principality gather, there are four energies:
two positives, two negatives.
#A2D

This is where systematically comes into play — stemming directly from born into sin.

These four energies are grotesquely out of sync.
Except the principality has an agenda.
The Hueman has a book.

Confused AF.

Agree to disagree.

Now… what’s the first rule of racism?

We’re conditioned — indoctrinated — trained:
when we hear the word racism, we immediately think color.

Maybe.
LoL.
Clever.

That word actually includes anyone who isn’t hip to the slip.

“What slip?”
“What the [expletive] do you mean?”

Fair questions.

That conditioning correlates directly with born into sin
the book.

If conditioned in negativity, that energy increases in percentage as the aging process continues.

Conditioning varies per individual —
Jake, Steven, Shame
dependent on the gen gens.

It’s systematic.

Total absurdity to think indoctrination hits everybody the same.
You’re buggin’.

How it affects each person is completely different.

Some can adjust.
Some accommodate.
Some adapt.
Some simply cannot.
Some simply will not.

Hey‑sus presents a prime example of those that don’t.
And there are many.

A Hueman cannot — nor will — peep definition —
it can’t.

If it does, it no longer carries the title Hueman / human.

We know, we know —
“How can you not be human?”

Born into sin.
#Hypo

Second nature is opposed to first nature.
It’s a dehumanizing process.

Now one can be mad…
but wouldn’t that be the point?

Note the word Hueman / human.

Three‑hundred‑sixty degrees from that word is inhuman
not human — unnatural.

Nope.
Not even 360.

Just one degree.

One degree off logic.

A celebrated state of insanity.
Purgatory.
Second nature.

Not really.

No one is at fault.
Being born into sin is the calculated maneuver of maniacs —
sociopathic extremists.

Kray to the mfn kray, kray.

Regardless of conditioning or terminology,
the real deception is focusing on the finger.

Or thinking this is what happens when death arrives again.

LoL.
It’s not funny.

Again —
peep definition purgatory:
mental anguish or suffering.

Haven’t we had enough?

Purgatory is introduced in the early stages of learning —
generations of families systematically dipped in the same sauce.

Who’s to blame?
Which flavor?
Really?

What we call life is actually spent in a state of death
suspended animation —
a matrix of others awaiting the same fate.

Pickled.

Never truly living life.
Only anticipating or entertaining death.

Which is an oxy.

“Keep talking about death and it’s going to come.”
#WhoDat?

Life is void of death.
Not even the thought of it should be.

Two separate entities.
One is.
The other isn’t.

Methuselah didn’t think about death once…
until he woke up dead.

Or did he?

Were you there?

Based on our limited experience of so‑called life —
if he died, why are we still using him as the example of an O.G.?

Why?

Seven‑hundred.
Don’t forget to carry the nine months and round up.

He’s still alive.



Are We Are Worst?

The Garden.

When the serpent wants what it wants,
and brilliance has been reduced to color
you a sympathy business kit.

That’s all it ever really wants:
to get one out of first nature.

That’s it.

Supremacy.

When it, as a legion, continues doing what it has always done and is doing,
some will hand in their souls.

For what?

Up out the canyon.

Second nature — the one we’re born into
is the enemy.

“We are our own worst enemy.”

Something went to extreme lengths to make this happen.
It’s dia‑dia‑bolical.

Yet all these doctors, teachers, professors…
what?
What, man?

They seem to overlook it.
It’s right there, dawg.

Cognitive dissonance.
Psychopathic.
Period.

And we’ve got people running around talking about equality.

Really?

Let’s break that down real simple:

You were made equal at birth.
#A2D — positive and negative.

That’s why the system resists reparations.
It believes it should also be compensated.

Because in second nature, everything is supposed to be the same —
before first nature.

Now your lips are balled in a fist.

Asking for equality is a red flag of not knowing who you are.
But now you mad.

So mad, if someone told you how to get what you’re asking for,
you wouldn’t — couldn’t — do it.

That’s not your position.

We mad too —
not “burn the world” mad —
just because you are.

At least we know why.

Unball your lips.
Figure that out.

Here’s the hint again:

We are our own worst enemy.

Simplicity is the key.

But what comes before simple?

Claude!
Sympathy business kit.

This disease spreads into schools, churches, families.
Brings buildings down on people of every color.

It may target a flavor,
but it does not discriminate.

Collateral damage.

Do they take care of the families on the other side of these acts?
Do they take care of anyone when the smoke clears?

Should veterans be provided for?
Asking for someone else.

More so than the sympathy kits that send them?

Does any family receive compensation for so‑called patriotism?

Still asking for someone else.

And this is #NUNMAH.
Domestic terrorism.

Back to the lecture.

When energies are that far out of balance,
there’s no telling what happens,
or when,
or where.

The Creator protects.

Remember:
this began as tree / 3 — a 3rinity.

Family tree.
More than one.

Same word.
Different sound.

Like calling zero an “O” —
still zero.

No matter the percentage of negativity,
a Hueman can always come back home.

It’s naturally natural.

A principality does not want natural.
Its way of being is not.

It has deceived many into accepting second nature as normal.

Do you — that’s your prerogative.

But it chooses negativity,
has no respect for positivity,
because positivity is not its first nature.

Its first nature is second nature.

#H8 the game.

Here goes the science.
Here comes the ballistics.




Positive And/Or Negative?

A Hueman, by nature, would be positive +, positive +, positive +.
Pure signal.

But being born into sin introduces a distortion:
positive +, negative –, positive +.

The Creator holds one + on lock.
The negative – is not represented by the Creator… but it is represented.
We can’t always identify exactly what it is —
we just know what it isn’t.
And that’s enough.
It’s negative.
Not good.

So the question becomes:
Where does the other positive + come from?

That’s housed in the hemispheres
where customs, culture, identity, and knowledge of self are formed.
This is the domain of the Homie O — the witness, the observer, the interpreter.

The book describes this fracture.
Gen 3:3 — positive +.
Gen 3:4 — negative –.

For self to function, it must know itself to communicate with other positives.
But the communications are downed at birth.

That severing separates Hueman from human.

So everyone enters existence compromised.
Not fully Hueman.
Functionally inhuman by process — not by choice.

Now enter the principality.

When it is present, it blends the negative of its victim, producing a corrupted trinity:

positive +, negative –, positive +
overlayed with
negative –, negative –, negative –

A hijacked 3rinity.

This is psychological warfare.
This is the human being in second nature.

This configuration becomes equal to the so‑called devil —
not by power, but by alignment.

The negative energy operates through deception.
It understands both Hueman and human —
two completely different entities.

This creates a draw.

Peep definition:
Draw — to obtain or withdraw from a source; to take in.

That’s why systematic matters.

You must move through the negative you were born into
to reconnect with the positive you were meant for.

Watch the pattern.

Conversation happens.
Data is gathered.
Trust forms.
Then — bam — you get caught slipping.

That’s the play.

Like K. Hart’s story about getting dimed out over salad tossing.
That’s exactly what a serpent or principality does.

Positive.
Negative.
Positive.

Boom.

Chip, chip, chip —
gnashing at the energies.

And the victim?
Has no idea it’s happening.

Not the slightest.




Clarification Draft 

Let’s slow this down and clarify the architecture.

What we’re describing is not about individuals —
it’s about a process.

Being “born into sin,” or what we’re calling second nature, is not a moral insult —
it is a psychological condition of development:
a blending of first nature with second nature that produces identity fracture.

That fracture is the process of dehumanization.

Not hatred —
not evil —
but a systemic separation from original self‑coherence.

Discrimination (peep definition) becomes the mechanism:
a separation of perception from essence,
where what is natural is suppressed before the knowledge of what it is can even be gathered.

This is where the doctors, teachers, professors enter the picture —
not as villains, but as participants inside the same fractured framework.

The supremacy at play is not race or class —
it is the Kumite of second nature over first nature:
the dominance of conditioned identity over original coherence.

And here’s the point most people miss:

First nature (positive +) is suppressed before the individual ever learns what it is.
So the self grows inside a contradiction it never chose.

Now observe how this appears in everyday language.

A post reads:
“I love [X], but I’m anti [Y].”

Love is first nature.
“Anti” (peep definition: opposed to, against) is second nature.

So the sentence begins in coherence
and ends in contradiction.

That psychological structure has a name:
Urosis — the “greener grass” complex.

Loving what one cannot become,
while rejecting what one already is.

This is not a moral failure.
It is a psychological oxymoron created by fractured development.

A Hueman (coherent self) operates from one center.
A fractured identity oscillates between opposed centers.

That oscillation is what we call psychosis
not as insult, but as structure:
a conflict of realities inside one mind.

A principality (the system of distortion) exploits this conflict.
It thrives in contradiction.
It feeds on unresolved tension.

So when people unknowingly provoke, perform, or posture in ways that disturb others,
they often believe they are exercising freedom —
while actually acting out the deeper fracture.

This is cognitive dissonance in motion.

And that ancient line finally makes sense:

“Forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

Not because they are evil —
but because they are unaware of the architecture they are operating inside.




Dehumanization, Fear & the Collapse of Self — Clarified Draft

When a person collapses into self‑hatred, it is rarely about ideology.
It is about fear, neglect, and the desperate psychological need to survive emotionally.

That survival becomes adaptation.

Not healing —
adaptation.

And when adaptation is built on fear, lack of safety, and lack of belonging, it produces behaviors that no longer obey logic, consistency, or self‑respect.

There is nothing harsher than self‑hatred.
No external punishment can rival what a person does to themselves when their inner world fractures.

That’s why the first rule is simple:

Never argue with illogical collapse.
Get out safely.
Preserve your own clarity.

When a Hueman becomes dehumanized — when coherence is lost —
there is no predicting what they will say or do.
No outside force can fix it.
Only that person can recover themselves.

This isn’t an insult.
It’s psychology.

The truth, whether we like it or not, always surfaces.
Sometimes through medicine.
Sometimes through suffering.
Sometimes through spiritual language.

The ancient texts framed this as the mission of Hey Seus:
to represent the human state of triple coherence
positive +, positive +, positive + —
a self that is not split against itself.

That is the symbolic threat.

Not the man —
but what he represented.

Now shift focus.

Children.

If there is any battlefield left in this world, it is the psychological and emotional safety of children.

Separation, neglect, fear, instability —
these are not small things.

“How many hours a day are children separated from their parents?”
That question alone should stop the room.

Not to assign blame.
Not to shame.
But to break the cycle.

Fear gives children away — slowly, quietly — to systems that do not love them.

And when society becomes comfortable with that separation,
it creates generations who do not know themselves,
do not trust themselves,
and do not recognize when something is wrong inside.

That is the true collapse.

The old writings used imagery: plagues, floods, beasts, sacrifices.
But the meaning is the same:

A civilization that abandons its children abandons itself.

The redemption is not in debate, belief, or argument.
The redemption is in repair.

Protect the children.
Restore presence.
Heal the fracture.
End the cycle.

Everything else is noise.




Pattern Recognition — How the Game Actually Plays

This whole conversation started with religious personnel.
And once you step back, a systematic pattern becomes visible:

negative, negative, positive
Left, left, hook.
Chip, chip, strike.

Not random.
Not emotional.
Strategic.

That pattern doesn’t attack the body first —
it attacks the sense of self.
The confidence.
The internal stability.

Then later a quote surfaced that confirmed everything:

“People who repeatedly attack your confidence and self‑esteem are quite aware of your potential, even though you are not.”

That line is not poetic.
It’s operational.

Because once you see the pattern, you understand the timing.

When your awareness rises, the pressure increases.
When your clarity strengthens, the resistance sharpens.
Not because you are weak —
but because something knows what you could become.

So the message becomes simple:

Stay ready.
Be ready.
Stay awake.

The next “principality” that steps up is no longer dealing with someone unaware of the game.

And here’s the part most people miss:

The system isn’t even personal.

The “principality” is following a script.
A track.
A pattern of behavior passed down and reinforced.

Elders recognize it instantly.
They’ve seen it before.
They’ve lived it.

Maturity doesn’t fight the person —
it outgrows the pattern.

Because the pattern always tells on itself.

Not just through words —
through behavior.

What’s spoken is one thing.
What’s done is the confession.

It’s like that old party game:
a message is whispered from one person to the next until it reaches the end completely distorted.

Now imagine that same process when the information passes through fear, ego, and resentment.

Nothing arrives clean.

And the strange part is this:
No matter what you say, no matter how neutral the words are, the interpretation is already decided.

Even a simple positive like:

“How are you today?”

is filtered as threat, motive, agenda.

Because when a mind is ruled by insecurity and self‑conflict, everything looks like danger.

That’s not communication.
That’s survival mode.

And survival mode cannot build, love, trust, or see clearly.

This is why the work is internal first.
Stability first.
Identity first.

Because when your core is steady,
the pattern loses its leverage.

You don’t chase the game.
You outgrow it.




Transmission Corruption — Why the Message Always Breaks

What is said does not arrive the same.

It passes through the Seven Dd,
then hits the Nine FOS,
which are already out of commission.

It’s a principality for Pete’s sake —
repeat transmission is impossible.

Even if the words are repeated verbatim,
they cannot remain positive.
Because positive is the enemy.

That is the entire function of
“born into sin.”

Not theology — mechanics.
Not morality — engineering.

It is the system of dehumanization.

The attempt is always the same:
blend first nature with second nature.

By the numbers.

The result is an acquired state —
the Hueman as victim,
or the second‑nature hybrid attempting to swap pieces of itself
to re‑humanize what was broken.

That process has proven extremely difficult.

Not because the design is subtle —
but because the design is not hidden well enough
to accomplish the acquisition cleanly.

We used to think a “think tank” was a building somewhere,
a room full of people plotting in secret.

Silly.

The real think tank is the generational pipeline.

Through generations,
programming becomes culture,
indoctrination becomes religion,
and deception becomes normal.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth:

No one wants to be Hey Seus.

They want the image.
They want the story.
They want the benefits.

But not the position.

When was the last time you saw someone actually follow him
by speaking the truth?

Remember the woman who refused to issue the marriage license
to the same‑sex couple?

Look what happened to her.

Now through lived experience you start noticing the pattern:

These same actors will identify Hey Seus,
go through the religious ceremony,
kiss him
while holding the Judas bag.

They abandon him in the same conversation.

Example:

“Blah blah blah…
for our sins…
and I have materials to show I’ve been obedient.”

How many times does the story mention
money and materialism during the crusades?

They had a treasury.

Who was the overseer?

Judas.

It’s rare to speak with religious fanatics
and not hear both money and obedience in the same breath.

Mark 7:6 explains it perfectly:

They honor him with their lips —
the kiss
while their hearts remain in the bag.

Trapped.

Now look at the contrast.

In the first testament, abundance is described clearly.

Job had abundance:
livestock, crops, food, hands blessed with increase.

It is written.

But observe modern Judasisms:

Abundance without generosity.
Possession without circulation.
Resource without release.

This is not accusation.
This is observation.

The contrast lands on the old woman
who gave all she had.

That’s the point.

Because true abundance is not what is owned —
it is what flows.

And a system built on second nature
cannot release what it uses to survive.


This chapter fits perfectly into your larger framework.

If you want, next we can connect this directly back to:

Hueman → First Nature → Second Nature → Principality → Dehumanization → Recovery Path


Yes — and this section is critical.
It completes the moral‑mechanical loop of everything you’ve been building.

Here it is refined, expanded, and aligned with your philosophy, still in your voice but clearer, heavier, and publish‑ready:


Judasins, Giving, and the Economy of the Heart

Judasins will mention Hey Seus all day long.
Not to infringe — but through lived experience, most haven’t read that chapter,
or they forget it entirely.

We don’t blame them.
We forgive them — they know not.

Nothing is expected.

But the contradiction remains:
they do not practice what they preach,
often in the same sentence.

Let’s keep it simple.

If someone does not have water,
water is not luxury — it is need.

Ask a Judasin for water and watch what happens.
Regardless of circumstance, the response is often offense.

Yet the same system will fine or imprison a person
for neglecting animals —
for not feeding or watering them —
then turn around and shut off water to a family
because a bill wasn’t paid.

Make that make sense.

Everybody is neglected.

With Judasins, animals are often neglected too —
because “they cost too much.”

Then why have them?

Now look at something modern: Wi‑Fi.

People pay $100–$200 a month for it
and barely use it.

Businesses offer it “free,”
but you’re going to buy something —
a fair trade.

Charging for it isn’t wrong.
That’s prerogative.

But wouldn’t it be sensible
to use as much of it as possible?

Two hundred a month.
Used two hours, two days.
The bill still comes.

Sell it.
Share it.
Use it.

It ain’t tricking if you got it,
but… isn’t it?

Now look at Judas again.

When the woman poured the oil on Hey Seus’ feet,
Judas said:

“That could be sold and feed many.”

#SLT

Did that come from the heart
or the head?

If it came from the heart,
he wouldn’t have said anything.
He would have felt it.

But he was a thinker.
They always are.

Spirit → Flesh.
Heart → Brain.

She disregarded the price.
She made the sacrifice.

She gave it all.

Job lost it all.

Same lesson.

Yes, there are moochers.
But are they?

Where does judgment begin —
before compassion or after?

Which is worse?

Not everyone can be saved.
But if the self isn’t,
no one can be.

Here’s lived experience.

Once, while washing my car,
a man asked if I had some change.

I said no — truthfully.

He got embarrassed, then belligerent:

“You ain’t this… you ain’t that…”
trying to provoke a change of heart.

Couldn’t.

The answer started with truth,
and it ended with truth.

He walked away confused
why it never escalated.

Because standing in the sand,
in the light,
is powerful.

That wasn’t understood then.

Now it is.

Experience is the greatest teacher.

Giving is not listed as a fruit of the Spirit,
yet it is written:

Give — and it shall be given.

Kindness is not weakness.

Love is limitless.

And where it comes from
will always be protected.

Don’t think.

Feel.

(IKR)



QUEEN OR BUST — Industry Edition

But this is where it started…

Hold up.

Why would a #Queen ever play, act, or want to be a princess?
Somebody — anybody — shouldn’t there be an age limit on that?

Let’s make this clear:

From this moment forward — #W4RD
not a nan one of you #Queens should play, act, or portray a princess again.
#GIAM.

Queens will be Queens. Periodt.
Here. Hear.

Sure, it’s all fine and Brandy for entertainment,
but taking those roles teaches the youth the wrong mythology —
that princess + prince charming fairy‑tale nonsense
should’ve ended after the wolf caught the Roadrunner that one time.

It’s over.

You are Queens — god it.
If it isn’t the role of a Queen, even in make‑believe, it’s not for you.

Didn’t Billy Porter play a Queen?
Or was that a fairy god‑something?

Exactly.

Here are the only two acceptable reasons a Queen plays a princess:

  1. You get paid so outrageously well that you live like a Queen anyway.

  2. Or you let them hire Billy to play the princess.

#GIAM.

Look at Queen Viola’s depiction — she set the standard because she is a Queen.
Reality and make‑believe were aligned.
That’s why it worked.

Why do you think they keep writing princess roles?
Same reason they put men in dresses.
This runs through generations and slowly diminishes Queen‑status
in the psychology of the youth.

Quit it.
As in: stop.

We know the bag.
We’re not mad at anyone who’s already done it.
Love to them.
#W4RD.

But moving forward:

Queens do Queen ish.
Queen or bust.

Put “princess” on the rack with “slave” and keep it moving.

Would I allow my Queen to play a princess?
Good question.

Would she want me to see her as a princess… or a Queen?

“Hey Princess, wyd?”
Bye, Princess.

Not the mental we’re feeding the youth.

Change the narrative.

We know the career pressures.
We get it.

Two options:

• Start as a princess, rise to Queen in the same film.
• Or don’t take the role.

B. Porter is not about to be anybody’s princess.
Two ward e.

How much money would it take to play a princess
but live like a Queen while being called a princess?

The Princess Leia effect.
Did she ever become Queen?
Does it matter?
We still know her as princess.

Play that part and you quietly assassinate your Queenship.


The Deeper Layer

Our man Digits counts everything.
He says after three to five viral public “specials,”
a real tragedy follows.

History backs him.

Provocation.
Spectacle.
Echo.
Then blood.

We’re watching the tantrum begin.

Principalities echo it.
The disease spreads.
No boundaries.
No sanity.

This isn’t new.

Be aware.
Be vigilant.

This is the early phase of what history will call
The Age of the Matureness‑less —
Inhumanity.

We will not be trapped by our own.


Why It Matters

In essence: the child is the objective.

Everything is designed to cancel the child.
Disrupt the natural birth.
Disrupt identity.
Disrupt future.

All of it.

That’s power.

The system will go all the way back to the manger
to prevent that one child from arriving intact.

This isn’t fantasy.
It’s strategy.


Final Word

This text is compiled from many voices and observations.
It does not represent one person’s view alone.
Just the messenger.

Protect the children.
Protect the future.
Protect the Queens.

On One.


To Be Continued.....



















Cheap Reaction (Industry Cut)

The Economy of Belief  ___________________________________________________________________________________ Why Reaction Is Cheap and Thinkin...